Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Green, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    Derrick Green appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied Green's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal. The Fourth Circuit determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented for their consideration and that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-04-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6267

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Derrick Green appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied Green's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal. The Fourth Circuit determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented for their consideration and that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    14 views2 pages

    United States v. Green, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Derrick Green appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the Fourth Circuit denied Green's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed his appeal. The Fourth Circuit determined that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented for their consideration and that oral arguments would not aid in their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6267

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DERRICK GREEN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR93-180-S, CA-98-4116-HNM)

    Submitted:

    April 15, 1999

    Decided:

    April 20, 1999

    Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Derrick Green, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Douglas Bennett, MILES &
    STOCKBRIDGE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Derrick Green seeks to appeal the district courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.
    1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts order

    and find no reversible error.

    See United States v. Green, Nos. CR-

    93-180-S; CA-98-4116-HNM (D. Md. Dec. 22, 1998).

    Accordingly, we

    deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like