Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. Grant, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing William Nathaniel Grant's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in denying Grant's motion. The appeals court therefore denied Grant a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Grant, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing William Nathaniel Grant's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in denying Grant's motion. The appeals court therefore denied Grant a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-04-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-6113

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing William Nathaniel Grant's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in denying Grant's motion. The appeals court therefore denied Grant a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Grant, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing William Nathaniel Grant's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in denying Grant's motion. The appeals court therefore denied Grant a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-6113

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    WILLIAM NATHANIEL GRANT,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
    Judge. (CR-92-36-C, CA-97-320-R)

    Submitted:

    April 15, 1999

    Decided:

    April 20, 1999

    Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    William Nathaniel Grant, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson,
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    William Nathaniel Grant seeks to appeal the district courts
    orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994
    & Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinions and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we

    deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the


    reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Grant, Nos.

    CR-92-36-C; CA-97-320-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 23 & Nov. 30, 1998).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like