Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Ronnie Devone Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his "Motion to Reach Final Disposition on Magistrate Judge Order filed October 30, 2000." The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court adopted Johnson's appendix and affirmed the district court's ruling, denying Johnson's motion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-03-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6003

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ronnie Devone Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his "Motion to Reach Final Disposition on Magistrate Judge Order filed October 30, 2000." The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court adopted Johnson's appendix and affirmed the district court's ruling, denying Johnson's motion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ronnie Devone Johnson appealed the district court's denial of his "Motion to Reach Final Disposition on Magistrate Judge Order filed October 30, 2000." The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court adopted Johnson's appendix and affirmed the district court's ruling, denying Johnson's motion. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6003

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RONNIE DEVONE JOHNSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CR-96-157-HO)

    Submitted:

    March 8, 2001

    Decided:

    March 16, 2001

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Ronnie Devone Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
    Anne Margaret Hayes,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronnie Devone Johnson appeals the district courts order denying his Motion to Reach Final Disposition on Magistrate Judge
    Order filed October 30, 2000.

    We have reviewed the record and the

    district courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    According-

    ly, we grant Johnsons motion to adopt appendix and affirm on the


    reasoning of the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. CR96-157-HO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like