Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    Brown v. Dollar, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tojuanna Brown appealed the district court's dismissal of her employment discrimination lawsuit against the National Credit Union Administration. The district court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss because Brown failed to contact an EEO counselor within 45 days of the alleged discriminatory event, as required to exhaust her administrative remedies. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for failure to timely exhaust administrative remedies.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Brown v. Dollar, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Tojuanna Brown appealed the district court's dismissal of her employment discrimination lawsuit against the National Credit Union Administration. The district court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss because Brown failed to contact an EEO counselor within 45 days of the alleged discriminatory event, as required to exhaust her administrative remedies. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for failure to timely exhaust administrative remedies.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-03-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-1952

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Tojuanna Brown appealed the district court's dismissal of her employment discrimination lawsuit against the National Credit Union Administration. The district court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss because Brown failed to contact an EEO counselor within 45 days of the alleged discriminatory event, as required to exhaust her administrative remedies. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for failure to timely exhaust administrative remedies.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Brown v. Dollar, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tojuanna Brown appealed the district court's dismissal of her employment discrimination lawsuit against the National Credit Union Administration. The district court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss because Brown failed to contact an EEO counselor within 45 days of the alleged discriminatory event, as required to exhaust her administrative remedies. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to dismiss the case for failure to timely exhaust administrative remedies.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-1952

    TOJUANNA BROWN,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    DENNIS DOLLAR, Chairman, National Credit Union
    Administration,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Claude M. Hilton, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-04-122)

    Submitted:

    February 28, 2005

    Decided:

    March 8, 2005

    Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Tojuanna Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr.,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Tojuanna
    granting

    the

    Brown

    Defendants

    appeals

    the

    motion

    to

    district
    dismiss

    courts
    her

    order

    employment

    discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of


    1964, as amended.

    We find that the district court correctly

    dismissed the action on the ground that Brown failed to timely


    exhaust her administrative remedies by contacting an EEO counselor
    within forty-five days of the alleged discriminatory event.
    C.F.R. 1614.105(a) (2004).
    courts order.

    29

    Accordingly, we affirm the district

    See Brown v. Dollar, No. CA-04-122 (E.D. Va. filed

    June 1, 2004 & entered June 2, 2004) (dismissing for the reasons
    stated from the bench). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like