Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Randy Brown, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Randy Christopher Brown's motion to reduce his sentence. Brown had filed a motion under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), which allows for sentence reductions when guidelines have been lowered. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of Brown's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-08-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6660

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Randy Christopher Brown's motion to reduce his sentence. Brown had filed a motion under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), which allows for sentence reductions when guidelines have been lowered. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of Brown's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Randy Brown, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Randy Christopher Brown's motion to reduce his sentence. Brown had filed a motion under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), which allows for sentence reductions when guidelines have been lowered. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of Brown's motion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6660

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    RANDY CHRISTOPHER BROWN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News.
    Arenda Wright Allen,
    District Judge. (4:08-cr-00103-AWA-FBS-1)

    Submitted:

    August 21, 2012

    Decided:

    August 28, 2012

    Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Randy Christopher Brown, Appellant Pro Se.


    Scott Christopher
    Alleman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk,
    Virginia; Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney,
    Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Randy Christopher Brown appeals the district courts
    order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a
    sentence reduction.
    reversible error.
    order.
    (E.D.

    United
    Va.

    Mar.

    We have reviewed the record and find no


    Accordingly, we affirm the district courts

    States
    13,

    v.

    2012).

    Brown,
    We

    No.

    4:08-cr-00103-AWA-FBS-1

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like