Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • McClure v. Carlson, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of David Allen McClure v. Michael H. Carlson et al. affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision on the reasoning provided in that court's opinion dated July 29, 1996. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-01-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-7369

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of David Allen McClure v. Michael H. Carlson et al. affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision on the reasoning provided in that court's opinion dated July 29, 1996. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    McClure v. Carlson, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of David Allen McClure v. Michael H. Carlson et al. affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision on the reasoning provided in that court's opinion dated July 29, 1996. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-7369

    DAVID ALLEN MCCLURE,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL H. CARLSON, Officer, Badge #1122;
    KEVIN J. SULLIVAN, Officer, Badge #1393;
    AUDREY MELBOURNE, Honorable Judge,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-96163-PJM)
    Submitted:

    December 19, 1996

    Decided:

    January 6, 1997

    Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
    Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    David Allen McClure, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
    Attorney General, Julia Melville Freit, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
    GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order in this civil
    action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. McClure v. Carlson, No. CA-96-163PJM (D. Md. July 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like