Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Walton v. Guidant Sales Corp, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Anthony Walton's employment discrimination claims against Guidant Sales Corporation for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It also denied Walton's motion for admission of additional documents and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Walton v. Guidant Sales Corp, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Anthony Walton's employment discrimination claims against Guidant Sales Corporation for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It also denied Walton's motion for admission of additional documents and dispensed with oral argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-10-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-1351

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Anthony Walton's employment discrimination claims against Guidant Sales Corporation for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It also denied Walton's motion for admission of additional documents and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Walton v. Guidant Sales Corp, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Anthony Walton's employment discrimination claims against Guidant Sales Corporation for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. It also denied Walton's motion for admission of additional documents and dispensed with oral argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-1351

    ANTHONY T. WALTON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GUIDANT SALES CORPORATION,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:05-cv00296-AMD)

    Submitted:

    September 8, 2006

    Decided:

    October 17, 2006

    Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony T. Walton, Appellant Pro Se.


    Glenn A. Cline, BALLARD,
    SPAHR, ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Lisa Ann
    Cooney, Steven William Suflas, BALLARD, SPAHR, ANDREWS & INGERSOLL,
    LLP, Voorhees, New Jersey, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony T. Walton appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his claims of employment discrimination for failure to
    exhaust administrative remedies.
    find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

    stated by the district court.

    See Walton v. Guidant Sales Corp.,

    No. 1:05-cv-00296-AMD (D. Md. Mar. 6, 2006).


    motion for admission of documents.

    We deny Waltons

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like