Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    Banoro Garrett v. The Norfolk Police Department, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court dismissed Banoro Garrett's appeal of a district court order that dismissed some defendants from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The appeals court found it did not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the district court's order was not a final decision and did not fall into the categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. As a result, the appeals court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Banoro Garrett v. The Norfolk Police Department, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    18 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court dismissed Banoro Garrett's appeal of a district court order that dismissed some defendants from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The appeals court found it did not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the district court's order was not a final decision and did not fall into the categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. As a result, the appeals court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-04-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1092

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court dismissed Banoro Garrett's appeal of a district court order that dismissed some defendants from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The appeals court found it did not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the district court's order was not a final decision and did not fall into the categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. As a result, the appeals court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    18 views2 pages

    Banoro Garrett v. The Norfolk Police Department, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court dismissed Banoro Garrett's appeal of a district court order that dismissed some defendants from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. The appeals court found it did not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the district court's order was not a final decision and did not fall into the categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. As a result, the appeals court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1092

    BANORO GARRETT,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    THE NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; THE NORFOLK SHERIFFS
    OFFICE; THE CITY OF NORFOLK; LIEUTENANT R. H. WEILER;
    SERGEANT R. D. LEWIS; OFFICER D. A. PACIFICO; OFFICER H. G.
    WHITE; ROBERT J. MCCABE; LIEUTENANT BONILLA; SERGEANT G.
    SNYDER; DEPUTY TAYLOR; M/DEPUTY A. MEARS; L. WILLIS; P.
    BELL; J. CUMMINS, L.P.N.; J. KIDD; DARRELL HILL,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
    Judge. (2:12-cv-00295-RAJ-LRL)

    Submitted:

    March 28, 2013

    Decided:

    April 2, 2013

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Banoro Garrett, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa H. Leiner, HARMAN,


    CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia; Melvin Wayne
    Ringer,
    CITY
    ATTORNEYS
    OFFICE,
    Norfolk,
    Virginia,
    for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Banoro Garrett seeks to appeal the district courts
    order

    dismissing

    (2006) action.

    some

    Defendants

    from

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

    final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory


    and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
    54(b); Cohen

    v.

    545-46 (1949).

    Beneficial

    Indus.

    Loan

    Corp.,

    337

    U.S.

    541,

    The order Garrett seeks to appeal is neither a

    final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.


    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
    dispense

    with

    contentions

    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    We

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like