Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • James v. Durham Center, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Larry Shelton James filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Durham Center Mental Health Department and the City of Durham Human Relations Commission, which was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). James appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-09-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6288

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Larry Shelton James filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Durham Center Mental Health Department and the City of Durham Human Relations Commission, which was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). James appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    James v. Durham Center, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Larry Shelton James filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the Durham Center Mental Health Department and the City of Durham Human Relations Commission, which was dismissed by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). James appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding no reversible error. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6288

    LARRY SHELTON JAMES,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DURHAM CENTER, Mental Health Department; CIVIL ADVOCATE, City
    of Durham Human Relations Commission,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Dever III,
    District Judge. (5:07-ct-03144-D)

    Submitted:

    September 16, 2008

    Decided:

    September 19, 2008

    Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Larry Shelton James, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Larry Shelton James appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915(e)(2)(B) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court. See James v. Durham Center, No. 5:07-ct-03144D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 8, 2008).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like