Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Bourger v. Eaton Corporation, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    Rosa McLean Bourger appealed the district court's granting of summary judgment to her employer Eaton Corporation in her employment discrimination suit. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to rule in favor of Eaton Corporation based on the reasoning provided. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately represented in the case materials, so oral arguments were not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-09-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-1592

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Rosa McLean Bourger appealed the district court's granting of summary judgment to her employer Eaton Corporation in her employment discrimination suit. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to rule in favor of Eaton Corporation based on the reasoning provided. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately represented in the case materials, so oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Bourger v. Eaton Corporation, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Rosa McLean Bourger appealed the district court's granting of summary judgment to her employer Eaton Corporation in her employment discrimination suit. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court agreed with the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to rule in favor of Eaton Corporation based on the reasoning provided. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately represented in the case materials, so oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-1592

    ROSA MCLEAN BOURGER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    EATON CORPORATION,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District
    Judge. (CA-98-266-1-T)

    Submitted:

    September 21, 2000

    Decided:

    September 27, 2000

    Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Rosa McLean Bourger, Appellant Pro Se. John James Doyle, Jr., Jill
    Stricklin Cox, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, Winston-Salem, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Rosa McLean Bourger appeals the district courts order granting summary judgment to Defendant in her employment discrimination
    suit. We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
    reversible error.
    district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    See Bourger v. Eaton Corp., No. CA-98-266-1-T

    (W.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like