Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    United States v. Maye, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing Orlandous Maye's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. It therefore granted Maye's request to proceed in forma pauperis, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appellate court determined oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Maye, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing Orlandous Maye's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. It therefore granted Maye's request to proceed in forma pauperis, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appellate court determined oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-12-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-7597

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing Orlandous Maye's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. It therefore granted Maye's request to proceed in forma pauperis, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appellate court determined oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Maye, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing Orlandous Maye's appeal of a district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appellate court reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. It therefore granted Maye's request to proceed in forma pauperis, denied a certificate of appealability, and dismissed the appeal based on the district court's reasoning. The appellate court determined oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-7597

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    ORLANDOUS L. MAYE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CR-99-104, CA-00-1171-AM)

    Submitted:

    November 28, 2000

    Decided:

    December 27, 2000

    Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Orlandous L. Maye, Appellant Pro Se. David Hackney, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Orlandous Maye seeks to appeal the district courts order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp. 2000).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and
    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed

    in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss


    the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    United States

    v. Maye, Nos. CR-99-104; CA-00-1171-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2000).


    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like