Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    United States v. Harris, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Derrick Lamont Harris appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's orders and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Harris a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in its orders from December 2001 and January 2002. The appeals court determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Harris, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Derrick Lamont Harris appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's orders and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Harris a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in its orders from December 2001 and January 2002. The appeals court determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-06-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6265

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Derrick Lamont Harris appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's orders and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Harris a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in its orders from December 2001 and January 2002. The appeals court determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Harris, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Derrick Lamont Harris appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's orders and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Harris a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in its orders from December 2001 and January 2002. The appeals court determined that oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6265

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DERRICK LAMONT HARRIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
    Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
    District Judge. (CR-98-1186, CA-01-4182)

    Submitted:

    June 20, 2002

    Decided:

    June 26, 2002

    Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Derrick Lamont Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Derrick Lamont Harris seeks to appeal the district courts
    orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West
    Supp. 2001) and denying his motion for reconsideration.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts orders and find no
    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly,

    we

    deny

    certificate

    of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the


    district court.

    See United States v. Harris, Nos. CR-98-1186, CA-

    01-4182 (D.S.C. filed Dec. 13, 2001; entered Dec. 14, 2001 & filed
    Jan. 9, 2002; entered Jan. 10, 2002).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like