Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wilson v. Hamidullah, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of Eric Jerrel Wilson's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the petition. While granting Wilson's request to proceed in forma pauperis, the appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its June 20, 2007 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-11-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7174

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of Eric Jerrel Wilson's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the petition. While granting Wilson's request to proceed in forma pauperis, the appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its June 20, 2007 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Wilson v. Hamidullah, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of Eric Jerrel Wilson's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the petition. While granting Wilson's request to proceed in forma pauperis, the appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its June 20, 2007 order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7174

    ERIC JERREL WILSON,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    MATTHEW B. HAMIDULLAH,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    Patrick Michael Duffy, District
    Judge. (4:07-cv-00013-PMD).

    Submitted:

    November 20, 2007

    Decided:

    November 29, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Eric Jerrel Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Eric Jerrel Wilson, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing

    the

    his

    28

    recommendation
    U.S.C.

    of

    2241

    the

    magistrate

    judge

    petition.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    error.

    and

    accepting

    (2000)

    Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

    pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.


    Wilson v. Hamidullah, No. 4:07-cv-00013-PMD (D.S.C. June 20, 2007).
    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like