Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anjofei v. Holder, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Henry Anjofei's petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision denying him relief from removal. The court reviewed the administrative record and found that Anjofei did not properly exhaust his challenge to the adverse credibility finding or his procedural due process claim before the Board, and thus could not review those claims. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The petition for review was dismissed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-07-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-2289

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Henry Anjofei's petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision denying him relief from removal. The court reviewed the administrative record and found that Anjofei did not properly exhaust his challenge to the adverse credibility finding or his procedural due process claim before the Board, and thus could not review those claims. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The petition for review was dismissed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Anjofei v. Holder, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Henry Anjofei's petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision denying him relief from removal. The court reviewed the administrative record and found that Anjofei did not properly exhaust his challenge to the adverse credibility finding or his procedural due process claim before the Board, and thus could not review those claims. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The petition for review was dismissed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-2289

    HENRY ANJOFEI,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
    Respondent.

    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration


    Appeals.

    Submitted:

    July 13, 2010

    Decided:

    July 23, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kevin M. Tabe, LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN M. TABE, P.C., Greenbelt,


    Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General,
    Leslie McKay, Assistant Director, Jason Wisecup, OFFICE OF
    IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Henry Anjofei, a native and citizen of Cameroon, seeks
    review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
    dismissing
    denying

    his

    relief

    appeal
    from

    of

    the

    Immigration

    removal.

    We

    Judges

    have

    decision

    reviewed

    the

    administrative record and conclude that Anjofeis challenge to


    the adverse credibility finding and his procedural due process
    claim were not properly exhausted before the Board, and thus are
    not

    subject

    to

    review.

    See

    U.S.C.

    1252(d)(1)

    Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review.

    (2006).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DISMISSED

    You might also like