Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    United States v. Dean, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Cedric Lamont Dean appealed the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately presented without the need for oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Dean, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a court case in which Cedric Lamont Dean appealed the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately presented without the need for oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-03-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6070

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case in which Cedric Lamont Dean appealed the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately presented without the need for oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Dean, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case in which Cedric Lamont Dean appealed the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately presented without the need for oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6070

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    CEDRIC LAMONT DEAN, a/k/a Ced,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
    District Judge. (CR-95-31-V, CA-01-362-V)

    Submitted:

    March 14, 2002

    Decided:

    March 26, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Cedric Lamont Dean, Appellant Pro Se.
    Gretchen C.F. Shappert,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Cedric Lamont Dean seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court. United States v. Dean, Nos. CR-95-31-V; CA-01362-V (W.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like