Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Sifford, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Tyrone Sifford appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Sifford's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its unpublished opinion dated November 26, 2001.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-07-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-6151

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Tyrone Sifford appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Sifford's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its unpublished opinion dated November 26, 2001.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States v. Sifford, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tyrone Sifford appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit therefore denied Sifford's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as set forth in its unpublished opinion dated November 26, 2001.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-6151

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    TYRONE SIFFORD,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Williams,
    Senior District Judge, sitting by designation.
    (CR-96-134-V,
    CA-00-242)

    Submitted:

    June 26, 2002

    Decided:

    July 18, 2002

    Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Tyrone Sifford, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Tyrone Sifford seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2001). We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate

    of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the


    district court.

    See United States v. Sifford, Nos. CR-96-134-V;

    CA-00-242 (W.D.N.C. filed Nov. 26, 2001; entered Nov. 28, 2001). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like