Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Roche v. Bledsoe, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is a 3 sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Felix Roche's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the petition. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-02-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-7591

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3 sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Felix Roche's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the petition. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Roche v. Bledsoe, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3 sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Felix Roche's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the petition. The Court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-7591

    FELIX ROCHE,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    B. A. BLEDSOE,
    AMERICA,

    Warden;

    UNITED

    STATES

    OF
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-05-501)

    Submitted: February 16, 2006

    Decided: February 22, 2006

    Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Felix Roche, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Felix Roche appeals the district courts order dismissing
    his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000) petition without prejudice.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

    district court.

    See

    Sept. 13, 2005).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    Roche v. Bledsoe, No. CA-05-501 (W.D. Va.

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like