Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anthony v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    Dewayne Lee Anthony filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against John Harvey Smith in district court. The district court denied relief to Anthony. Anthony appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Anthony for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-12-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7138

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Dewayne Lee Anthony filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against John Harvey Smith in district court. The district court denied relief to Anthony. Anthony appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Anthony for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Anthony v. Smith, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Dewayne Lee Anthony filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against John Harvey Smith in district court. The district court denied relief to Anthony. Anthony appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief to Anthony for the reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7138

    DEWAYNE LEE ANTHONY,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JOHN HARVEY SMITH,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (5:10-cv-00033-GCM)

    Submitted:

    November 30, 2010

    Decided:

    December 7, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Dewayne Lee Anthony, Appellant Pro Se.


    Oliver Gray Wheeler,
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Dewayne Lee Anthony appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    See Anthony v. Smith, No. 5:10-cv-00033-GCM (W.D.N.C.

    court.

    Aug. 2, 2010).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like