Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Franklin v. Boggs, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Earl Franklin filed a § 1983 complaint against a US Attorney, federal judge, and assistant US Attorney. The district court denied relief and Franklin appealed. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had accepted the magistrate's recommendation to deny the complaint. The appeals court ruled without oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-05-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6341

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Earl Franklin filed a § 1983 complaint against a US Attorney, federal judge, and assistant US Attorney. The district court denied relief and Franklin appealed. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had accepted the magistrate's recommendation to deny the complaint. The appeals court ruled without oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    Franklin v. Boggs, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Earl Franklin filed a § 1983 complaint against a US Attorney, federal judge, and assistant US Attorney. The district court denied relief and Franklin appealed. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which had accepted the magistrate's recommendation to deny the complaint. The appeals court ruled without oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6341

    EARL ANDERSON FRANKLIN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LISA BLUE BOGGS, United States Attorney; N.
    CARLTON TILLEY, JR., U. S. District Judge;
    WALTER C. HOLTON, JR., Assistant United States
    Attorney,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-157-1)

    Submitted:

    May 11, 2000

    Decided:

    May 17, 2000

    Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Earl Anderson Franklin, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Earl Anderson Franklin appeals the district courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    accepting the magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis-

    trict court. See Franklin v. Boggs, No. CA-00-157-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb.


    25, 2000).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like