Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Al-Musawwir v. Young, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Abdul-Hasib Al-Musawwir in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Al-Musawwir v. Young, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Abdul-Hasib Al-Musawwir in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-02-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7032

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Abdul-Hasib Al-Musawwir in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    12 views2 pages

    Al-Musawwir v. Young, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Abdul-Hasib Al-Musawwir in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7032

    ABDUL-HASIB AL-MUSAWWIR,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    S. K. YOUNG, Warden, Wallens Ridge
    Prison; COMMISSARY MANAGER VANOVER,

    State
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-01-391-7)

    Submitted:

    January 31, 2002

    Decided:

    February 6, 2002

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Abdul-Hasib al-Musawwir, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Abdul-Hasib Al-Musawwir appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the

    reasoning of the district court. See Al-Musawwir v. Young, No. CA01-391-7 (W.D. Va. May 29, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like