Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    Miano v. Barnhart, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Linda Miano appealed the denial of her claim for supplemental security income benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. 2) The magistrate judge affirmed the Commissioner's denial of benefits. Miano then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and briefs and found no reversible error, affirming the magistrate judge's ruling that upheld the Commissioner's denial of benefits to Miano.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Miano v. Barnhart, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    1) Linda Miano appealed the denial of her claim for supplemental security income benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. 2) The magistrate judge affirmed the Commissioner's denial of benefits. Miano then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and briefs and found no reversible error, affirming the magistrate judge's ruling that upheld the Commissioner's denial of benefits to Miano.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-06-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-2431

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Linda Miano appealed the denial of her claim for supplemental security income benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. 2) The magistrate judge affirmed the Commissioner's denial of benefits. Miano then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and briefs and found no reversible error, affirming the magistrate judge's ruling that upheld the Commissioner's denial of benefits to Miano.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Miano v. Barnhart, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Linda Miano appealed the denial of her claim for supplemental security income benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. 2) The magistrate judge affirmed the Commissioner's denial of benefits. Miano then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. 3) The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and briefs and found no reversible error, affirming the magistrate judge's ruling that upheld the Commissioner's denial of benefits to Miano.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-2431

    LINDA MIANO,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JO ANNE BARNHART,
    Security,

    Commissioner

    of

    Social
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Abingdon.
    Pamela Meade Sargent,
    Magistrate Judge. (CA-02-162-1)

    Submitted:

    May 28, 2004

    Decided:

    June 17, 2004

    Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Martin Wegbreit, Southwest Virginia Legal Aid Society, Castlewood,


    Virginia, for Appellant. Patricia M. Smith, Acting Regional Chief
    Counsel, Region III, Taryn F. Goldstein, Assistant Regional
    Counsel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, John L. Brownlee, United
    States Attorney, Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney,
    Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Linda

    Miano

    appeals

    the

    magistrate

    judges

    order

    affirming the Commissioners denial of supplemental security income


    benefits.*

    We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the

    decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law


    was applied.

    See 42 U.S.C. 405(g) (2000); Craig v. Chater, 76

    F.3d 585, 589 (4th Cir. 1996).

    We have thoroughly reviewed the

    record and the briefs and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.


    Barnhart, No. CA-02-162-1 (W.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2003).

    Miano v.

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    The parties consented to review by


    pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2) (2000).
    - 2 -

    magistrate

    judge

    You might also like