Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 22 views

    United States v. Charles Anderson Miller, 68 F.3d 462, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Miller appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion denying Miller's motion. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Miller's appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Charles Anderson Miller, 68 F.3d 462, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    22 views1 page
    Charles Miller appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion denying Miller's motion. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Miller's appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-10-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 68 F.3d 462 Docket: 95-6310

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Miller appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion denying Miller's motion. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Miller's appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    22 views1 page

    United States v. Charles Anderson Miller, 68 F.3d 462, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Miller appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding no reversible error in the district court's opinion denying Miller's motion. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Miller's appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    68 F.

    3d 462

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Charles Anderson MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 95-6310.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Oct. 12, 1995.
    Decided: Oct. 23, 1995.

    Charles Anderson Miller, Appellant Pro Se.


    Robert Daniel Potter, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
    2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. United States v. Miller, Nos. CR-90-69-BR; CA-95-98-5BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like