Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Erma Matthews v. M.C. Dean, Incorporated, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Erma Matthews appealed a district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer, M.C. Dean, Inc. and Michael Dean in a case involving her employment termination. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated at the summary judgment hearing, concluding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented and that oral argument was not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Erma Matthews v. M.C. Dean, Incorporated, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Erma Matthews appealed a district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer, M.C. Dean, Inc. and Michael Dean in a case involving her employment termination. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated at the summary judgment hearing, concluding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented and that oral argument was not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-06-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-1322

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Erma Matthews appealed a district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer, M.C. Dean, Inc. and Michael Dean in a case involving her employment termination. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated at the summary judgment hearing, concluding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented and that oral argument was not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Erma Matthews v. M.C. Dean, Incorporated, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Erma Matthews appealed a district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer, M.C. Dean, Inc. and Michael Dean in a case involving her employment termination. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated at the summary judgment hearing, concluding that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented and that oral argument was not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-1322

    ERMA J. MATTHEWS,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    M.C. DEAN, INCORPORATED; MICHAEL DEAN,
    Defendants Appellees,
    and
    M.C. DEAN, a/k/a Michael Dean,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Leonie M. Brinkema,
    District Judge. (1:09-cv-00622-LMB-TRJ)

    Submitted:

    November 5, 2010

    Decided:

    June 23, 2011

    Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Erma J. Matthews, Appellant Pro Se.


    Manesh Kumar Rath, Robert
    Austin Sheffield, KELLER & HECKMAN, Washington, D.C., for
    Appellee M.C. Dean, Incorporated.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Erma J. Matthews appeals the district courts order
    granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court at the summary judgment hearing.

    Matthews v. M.C. Dean,

    Inc., No. 1:09-cv-00622-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2010).


    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like