Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Davis, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing an appeal from Luellen Davis of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in its February 1, 1996 opinion. The appellate court determined oral argument was not necessary to aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6273

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing an appeal from Luellen Davis of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in its February 1, 1996 opinion. The appellate court determined oral argument was not necessary to aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Davis, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion dismissing an appeal from Luellen Davis of the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as explained in its February 1, 1996 opinion. The appellate court determined oral argument was not necessary to aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6273

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    LUELLEN DAVIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
    Judge. (CR-92-366, CA-96-85-20-6)
    Submitted:

    June 11, 1996

    Decided:

    June 25, 1996

    Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Luellen Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Raymond Hawley, Jr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his
    28 U.S.C. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
    district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on
    the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Davis, Nos.
    CR-92-366; CA-96-85-20-6 (D.S.C. Feb. 1, 1996). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like