Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Moffitt v. City of Charlotte, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's granting of the defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law in a case alleging violations of civil rights statutes. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, so it affirmed the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-01-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-2914

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's granting of the defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law in a case alleging violations of civil rights statutes. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, so it affirmed the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Moffitt v. City of Charlotte, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's granting of the defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law in a case alleging violations of civil rights statutes. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors, so it affirmed the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-2914

    CLAUDE F. MOFFITT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA; TRANSIT
    MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE; DAVID HINES; REBECCA
    CHERRY; ROBERT WILLIAMS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District
    Judge. (CA-92-438-MU)
    Submitted:

    December 17, 1996

    Decided:

    January 13, 1997

    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Claude F. Moffitt, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Dennis McDonnell,
    Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a) motion for judgment as a matter of law
    in this action alleging a violation of 42 U.S.C. 1985, 1986
    (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. Moffitt v. City of Charlotte, No. CA92-438-MU (W.D.N.C. Sept. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like