Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Alexander v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    John Douglas Alexander filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision without hearing oral arguments. The Fourth Circuit found no errors in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny Alexander's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's reasoning that Alexander's claims did not warrant relief under § 1983.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-02-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7037

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John Douglas Alexander filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision without hearing oral arguments. The Fourth Circuit found no errors in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny Alexander's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's reasoning that Alexander's claims did not warrant relief under § 1983.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Alexander v. Moore, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John Douglas Alexander filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision without hearing oral arguments. The Fourth Circuit found no errors in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation to deny Alexander's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's reasoning that Alexander's claims did not warrant relief under § 1983.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7037

    JOHN DOUGLAS ALEXANDER,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MICHAEL MOORE, Director; WILLIAM D. CATOE,
    Deputy Director; COLIE L. RUSHTON; LEROY
    CARTLEDGE, Major; D. MCTAGGER, Captain; P.
    JONES, Lieutenant,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-97-2598-6-20AK)

    Submitted:

    February 11, 1999

    Decided:

    February 23, 1999

    Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    John Douglas Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Franklin Turner,
    Jr., CLARKSON, FORTSON, WALSH & RHENEY, P.A., Greenville, South
    Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district courts order denying relief on
    his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint.

    We have re-

    viewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting the
    magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    Alexander v. Moore, No. CA-97-2598-6-20AK (D.S.C. June 18, 1998).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like