Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Love v. Murphy, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Mark Love's motion for injunctive relief and dismissal of his civil action. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and briefs and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Court also denied Love's request for oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Love v. Murphy, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Mark Love's motion for injunctive relief and dismissal of his civil action. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and briefs and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Court also denied Love's request for oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-09-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-1415

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Mark Love's motion for injunctive relief and dismissal of his civil action. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and briefs and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Court also denied Love's request for oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Love v. Murphy, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of Mark Love's motion for injunctive relief and dismissal of his civil action. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and briefs and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Court also denied Love's request for oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the written materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-1415

    MARK C. LOVE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JOSEPH F. MURPHY, JR.; DEBORAH S. EYLER; ARRIE
    W. DAVIS; PETER B. KRAUSER,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA02-682-CCB)

    Submitted:

    August 9, 2002

    Decided:

    September 11, 2002

    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Mark C. Love, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Mark C. Love appeals the district courts order denying his
    motion for temporary and permanent injunctive relief and subsequent
    dismissal of his civil action. We have reviewed the record, Loves
    brief, and the district courts opinion and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    See Love v. Murphy, No. CA-02-682-CCB (D. Md. Mar. 8 & Apr.

    1, 2002).

    We deny Loves request for oral argument because the

    facts

    legal

    and

    materials

    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like