Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Hill v. NC Department Corr, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Calvia Lynn Hill appealed a district court order granting summary judgment to the North Carolina Department of Corrections in Hill's action against them. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning. The appeals court denied Hill's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Hill v. NC Department Corr, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Calvia Lynn Hill appealed a district court order granting summary judgment to the North Carolina Department of Corrections in Hill's action against them. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning. The appeals court denied Hill's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-09-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-1310

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Calvia Lynn Hill appealed a district court order granting summary judgment to the North Carolina Department of Corrections in Hill's action against them. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning. The appeals court denied Hill's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Hill v. NC Department Corr, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Calvia Lynn Hill appealed a district court order granting summary judgment to the North Carolina Department of Corrections in Hill's action against them. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's reasoning. The appeals court denied Hill's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-1310

    CALVIA LYNN HILL,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-429-5-BO-2)

    Submitted:

    August 24, 1999

    Decided:

    September 3, 1999

    Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Calvia Lynn Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Dorothy Powers, NORTH CAROLINA
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Calvia Lynn Hill appeals the district courts order granting
    summary judgment in his action against the North Carolina Department of Corrections.

    We have reviewed the record and the district

    courts opinion and find no reversible error.


    affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

    Accordingly, we
    See Hill v. North

    Carolina Dept of Corrections, No. CA-98-429-5-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. Feb.


    26, 1999).

    We deny Hills motion for appointment of counsel.

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like