Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • John Lewis Locklear v. Hubert Stone, Two Unnamed Deputies, 809 F.2d 785, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    1) This document is an unpublished disposition from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of John Lewis Locklear v. Hubert Stone and two unnamed deputies. 2) The Court of Appeals found that Locklear's appeal from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. 3) The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the district court on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion, citing Locklear v. Stone, C/A No. 86-832-CRT (E.D.N.C., Sept. 10, 1986).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-01-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 809 F.2d 785 Docket: 86-6766

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) This document is an unpublished disposition from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of John Lewis Locklear v. Hubert Stone and two unnamed deputies. 2) The Court of Appeals found that Locklear's appeal from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. 3) The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the district court on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion, citing Locklear v. Stone, C/A No. 86-832-CRT (E.D.N.C., Sept. 10, 1986).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views1 page

    John Lewis Locklear v. Hubert Stone, Two Unnamed Deputies, 809 F.2d 785, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) This document is an unpublished disposition from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of John Lewis Locklear v. Hubert Stone and two unnamed deputies. 2) The Court of Appeals found that Locklear's appeal from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. 3) The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the district court on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion, citing Locklear v. Stone, C/A No. 86-832-CRT (E.D.N.C., Sept. 10, 1986).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    809 F.

    2d 785
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    John Lewis LOCKLEAR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Hubert STONE, Two unnamed deputies, Defendants-Appellees,
    No. 86-6766.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Oct. 31, 1986.
    Decided Jan. 5, 1987.

    Before WIDENER, HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.


    John Lewis Locklear, appellant pro se.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
    the district court. Locklear v. Stone, C/A No. 86-832-CRT (E.D.N.C., Sept. 10,
    1986).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like