Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • J.B. Henry v. Carolyn Colvin, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment to the Commissioner and upholding the denial of J.B. Henry's application for disability insurance benefits. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the magistrate judge's ruling for the reasons stated in that ruling. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-11-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1411

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment to the Commissioner and upholding the denial of J.B. Henry's application for disability insurance benefits. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the magistrate judge's ruling for the reasons stated in that ruling. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    J.B. Henry v. Carolyn Colvin, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment to the Commissioner and upholding the denial of J.B. Henry's application for disability insurance benefits. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It therefore affirmed the magistrate judge's ruling for the reasons stated in that ruling. The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1411

    J. B. HENRY,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
    Administration,

    Acting

    Commissioner,

    Social

    Security

    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    David J. Novak, Magistrate
    Judge. (3:13-cv-00357-DJN)

    Submitted:

    October 28, 2014

    Decided:

    November 4, 2014

    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Bruce K. Billman, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for Appellant. Nora


    Koch,
    Acting
    Regional
    Chief
    Counsel,
    Taryn
    F.
    Jasner,
    Supervisory
    Attorney,
    Jordana
    Cooper,
    Assistant
    Regional
    Counsel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Dana J. Boente, United
    States Attorney, Elizabeth C. Wu, Assistant United States
    Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    J.B. Henry appeals the order of the magistrate judge
    granting summary judgment to the Commissioner and upholding the
    denial of Henrys application for disability insurance benefits.
    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate


    judge.

    Henry v. Colvin, No. 3:13-cv-00357-DJN (E.D. Va. Mar. 4,

    2014).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal
    before

    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like