Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    In Re: Ronnie Rainey V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Ronnie Rainey's petition for a writ of mandamus. Rainey had alleged that the district court unduly delayed acting on post-judgment motions he filed in his criminal case. However, the Court of Appeals found that the district court had recently denied Rainey's motions on October 29, 2014, making the mandamus petition moot. As a result, the Court denied the petition and also denied Rainey's motions to appoint counsel and for summary remand.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    In Re: Ronnie Rainey V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Ronnie Rainey's petition for a writ of mandamus. Rainey had alleged that the district court unduly delayed acting on post-judgment motions he filed in his criminal case. However, the Court of Appeals found that the district court had recently denied Rainey's motions on October 29, 2014, making the mandamus petition moot. As a result, the Court denied the petition and also denied Rainey's motions to appoint counsel and for summary remand.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-11-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1652

    Original Title

    In re: Ronnie Rainey v., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Ronnie Rainey's petition for a writ of mandamus. Rainey had alleged that the district court unduly delayed acting on post-judgment motions he filed in his criminal case. However, the Court of Appeals found that the district court had recently denied Rainey's motions on October 29, 2014, making the mandamus petition moot. As a result, the Court denied the petition and also denied Rainey's motions to appoint counsel and for summary remand.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    In Re: Ronnie Rainey V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied Ronnie Rainey's petition for a writ of mandamus. Rainey had alleged that the district court unduly delayed acting on post-judgment motions he filed in his criminal case. However, the Court of Appeals found that the district court had recently denied Rainey's motions on October 29, 2014, making the mandamus petition moot. As a result, the Court denied the petition and also denied Rainey's motions to appoint counsel and for summary remand.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1652

    In re: RONNIE D. RAINEY,

    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (5:10-cr-00199-D-1)

    Submitted:

    October 31, 2014

    Decided:

    November 6, 2014

    Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ronnie D. Rainey, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronnie D. Rainey petitions for a writ of mandamus,
    alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on postjudgment

    motions

    he

    filed

    proceedings against him.

    in

    connection

    docket

    reveals

    the

    criminal

    He seeks an order from this court

    directing the district court to act.


    courts

    with

    that

    motions on October 29, 2014.

    the

    Our review of the district


    district

    court

    denied

    the

    Accordingly, because the district

    court has recently disposed of Raineys motions, we deny the


    mandamus petition as moot.

    We grant leave to proceed in forma

    pauperis and deny Raineys motions to appoint counsel and for


    summary
    facts

    remand.

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    because

    presented

    would

    not

    the

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like