Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: Detrine Hudson V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    1) Detrine Hudson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed processing his notice of appeal in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 2) The appeals court reviewed the district court docket and found that the district court had docketed Hudson's notice of appeal and forwarded it to the appeals court. 3) Because the district court recently acted on the notice of appeal, the appeals court denied the mandamus petitions as moot.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-11-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1685

    Original Title

    In re: Detrine Hudson v., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Detrine Hudson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed processing his notice of appeal in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 2) The appeals court reviewed the district court docket and found that the district court had docketed Hudson's notice of appeal and forwarded it to the appeals court. 3) Because the district court recently acted on the notice of appeal, the appeals court denied the mandamus petitions as moot.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    In Re: Detrine Hudson V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Detrine Hudson filed a petition for a writ of mandamus alleging that the district court unduly delayed processing his notice of appeal in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 2) The appeals court reviewed the district court docket and found that the district court had docketed Hudson's notice of appeal and forwarded it to the appeals court. 3) Because the district court recently acted on the notice of appeal, the appeals court denied the mandamus petitions as moot.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1685

    In Re: DETRINE HUDSON,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (0:13-cv-03075-RMG)

    Submitted:

    November 17, 2014

    Decided:

    November 20, 2014

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Detrine Hudson, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Detrine
    mandamus,

    Hudson

    alleging

    the

    has

    filed

    district

    petitions
    court

    for

    has

    unduly

    writ

    of

    delayed

    processing a notice of appeal he filed in a 42 U.S.C. 1983


    (2012) action.

    He seeks an order from this court directing the

    district

    to

    court

    act.

    Our

    review

    of

    the

    district

    courts

    docket reveals that the district court docketed the notice of


    appeal and forwarded it to this court.

    Accordingly, because the

    district

    we

    court

    has

    petitions as moot.
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    recently

    acted,

    deny

    the

    mandamus

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like