Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Amanda Deese, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    52 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Amanda Deese's motion for an amended restitution order. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Deese's motion for the reasons stated in the lower court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-11-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7102

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Amanda Deese's motion for an amended restitution order. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Deese's motion for the reasons stated in the lower court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    52 views2 pages

    United States v. Amanda Deese, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Amanda Deese's motion for an amended restitution order. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Deese's motion for the reasons stated in the lower court's decision. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7102

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    AMANDA DEESE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
    District Judge. (2:12-cr-00110-RBS-LRL-1)

    Submitted:

    November 18, 2014

    Decided:

    November 21, 2014

    Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Amanda Deese, Appellant Pro Se.


    Alan Mark Salsbury, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Amanda

    Deese

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    denying her motion for an amended restitution order.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    order

    We have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United

    States v. Deese, No. 2:12-cr-00110-RBS-LRL-1 (E.D. Va. June 27,


    2014).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like