Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 13 views

    Christopher Julian v. USDA, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders denying relief to Christopher and Renee Julian in their civil complaint against the US Department of Agriculture, several federal employees, and one state employee. The Julian's appealed, and the Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its orders.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Christopher Julian v. USDA, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    13 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders denying relief to Christopher and Renee Julian in their civil complaint against the US Department of Agriculture, several federal employees, and one state employee. The Julian's appealed, and the Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its orders.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-11-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1480

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders denying relief to Christopher and Renee Julian in their civil complaint against the US Department of Agriculture, several federal employees, and one state employee. The Julian's appealed, and the Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its orders.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    13 views3 pages

    Christopher Julian v. USDA, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders denying relief to Christopher and Renee Julian in their civil complaint against the US Department of Agriculture, several federal employees, and one state employee. The Julian's appealed, and the Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in its orders.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1480

    CHRISTOPHER B. JULIAN; RENEE G. JULIAN,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    v.
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JAMES RIGNEY, USDA
    Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Officer; RONALD A. KRASZEWSKI,
    USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Manager; WANDA JOHNSON,
    Virginia Agricultural Mediation Program Project Director; J.
    CALVIN PARRISH, USDA Farm Service Agency State Executive
    Director; JERRY L. KING, USDA National Appeals Division
    Hearing Officer; BARBARA MCLEAN; CHRIS P. BEYERHELM, USDA
    Farm Service Agency Deputy Administrator for Farm Loan
    Programs; ROGER KLURFELD, USDA National Appeals Division
    Director,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    No. 14-1925

    CHRISTOPHER B. JULIAN; RENEE G. JULIAN,


    Plaintiffs Appellants,
    v.
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; JAMES RIGNEY, USDA
    Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Officer; RONALD A. KRASZEWSKI,
    USDA Farm Service Agency Farm Loan Manager; WANDA JOHNSON,
    Virginia Agricultural Mediation Program Project Director; J.
    CALVIN PARRISH, USDA Farm Service Agency State Executive
    Director; JERRY L. KING, USDA National Appeals Division
    Hearing Officer; BARBARA MCLEAN; CHRIS P. BEYERHELM, USDA
    Farm Service Agency Deputy Administrator for Farm Loan

    Programs;
    Director,

    ROGER

    KLURFELD,

    USDA

    National

    Appeals

    Division

    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Danville.
    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (4:13-cv-00054-JLK-RSB)

    Submitted:

    November 20, 2014

    Decided:

    November 24, 2014

    Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Christopher B. Julian; Renee G. Julian, Appellants Pro Se.


    Kartic Padmanabhan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
    Roanoke,
    Virginia;
    Katherine
    Michelle
    DeCoster,
    Assistant
    Attorney General, Abingdon, Virginia; Rhodes Beahm Ritenour,
    Deputy Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Christopher B. Julian and Renee G. Julian appeal the
    district courts orders denying relief on their civil complaint
    against

    the

    United

    States

    Department

    of

    federal employees, and one state employee.


    record and find no reversible error.

    Agriculture,

    seven

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.

    Julian v. U.S. Dept

    of Agric., No. 4:13-cv-00054-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2014;


    Aug. 15, 2014).
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like