Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • William Moore v. John Crow, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding William D. Moore's appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Moore v. Crow, No. 5:14-cv-00015-FDW. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-11-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-6935

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding William D. Moore's appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Moore v. Crow, No. 5:14-cv-00015-FDW. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    William Moore v. John Crow, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding William D. Moore's appeal of the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in Moore v. Crow, No. 5:14-cv-00015-FDW. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-6935

    WILLIAM D. MOORE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JOHN CROW, Administrator, Lincoln Correctional Center; RANDY
    S. MULL, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; KAREN LOPOUS, Food
    Service; ROGER PATTERSON, Regional Director,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
    Frank D. Whitney,
    Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00015-FDW)

    Submitted:

    November 20, 2014

    Decided:

    November 25, 2014

    Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    William D. Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    William D. Moore appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
    reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.


    We

    dispense

    contentions

    with
    are

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    oral

    Moore v. Crow, No. 5:14-cv-00015-FDW.


    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the

    facts

    and

    the

    materials

    legal
    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like