Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Douglas Thompson v. Captain Kelley, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Douglas Thompson's motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and reopen his case. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in Thompson v. Kelley, No. 0:12-cv-02220-CMC (D.S.C. June 3, 2014).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-11-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7023

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Douglas Thompson's motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and reopen his case. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in Thompson v. Kelley, No. 0:12-cv-02220-CMC (D.S.C. June 3, 2014).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Douglas Thompson v. Captain Kelley, 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's denial of Douglas Thompson's motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and reopen his case. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in Thompson v. Kelley, No. 0:12-cv-02220-CMC (D.S.C. June 3, 2014).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7023

    DOUGLAS THOMPSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CAPTAIN KELLEY; LIEUTENANT HARRIET,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    TURBEVILLE
    PILGRIM,

    CORRECTIONAL

    INSTITUTION,

    SCDC;

    INMATE

    JAMES

    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
    Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior
    District Judge. (0:12-cv-02220-CMC)

    Submitted:

    November 20, 2014

    Decided:

    November 25, 2014

    Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Douglas Thompson, Appellant Pro Se.


    Walker Heinitsh Willcox,
    WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Douglas
    denying

    his

    Thompson

    motion

    to

    appeals

    amend

    his

    complaint and reopen his case.


    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    the
    42

    district
    U.S.C.

    courts
    1983

    order
    (2012)

    We have reviewed the record and


    Accordingly,

    reasons stated by the district court.


    0:12-cv-02220-CMC (D.S.C. June 3, 2014).

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    Thompson v. Kelley, No.


    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like