Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In Re: John Curran, III V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    16 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied John F. Jef Curran's petition for a writ of mandamus. Curran had alleged undue delay by the district court in acting on his motion to vacate his conviction. However, the Court of Appeals found that the district court had recently denied Curran's motion, rendering the mandamus petition moot. As the district court had already ruled on the motion, the Court of Appeals denied the petition without need for further argument.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2014-12-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-1868

    Original Title

    In Re: John Curran, III v., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied John F. Jef Curran's petition for a writ of mandamus. Curran had alleged undue delay by the district court in acting on his motion to vacate his conviction. However, the Court of Appeals found that the district court had recently denied Curran's motion, rendering the mandamus petition moot. As the district court had already ruled on the motion, the Court of Appeals denied the petition without need for further argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    16 views2 pages

    In Re: John Curran, III V., 4th Cir. (2014)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied John F. Jef Curran's petition for a writ of mandamus. Curran had alleged undue delay by the district court in acting on his motion to vacate his conviction. However, the Court of Appeals found that the district court had recently denied Curran's motion, rendering the mandamus petition moot. As the district court had already ruled on the motion, the Court of Appeals denied the petition without need for further argument.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-1868

    In Re: JOHN F. JEF CURRAN, III,


    Petitioner.

    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.


    (1:11-cr-00687-RDB-1)

    Submitted:

    December 3, 2014

    Decided:

    December 11, 2014

    Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
    Judge.

    Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John F. Jef Curran, III, Petitioner Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    John

    F.

    Jef

    Curran,

    III,

    petitions

    for

    writ

    of

    mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting


    on his motion to vacate conviction in accordance with Fed. R.
    Crim. P. 52(b).
    district

    court

    He seeks an order from this court directing the


    to

    act.

    Our

    review

    of

    the

    district

    courts

    docket reveals that the district court has denied the motion.
    Accordingly,

    because

    Currans

    case,

    we

    dispense

    with

    oral

    contentions

    are

    the

    deny

    district
    the

    argument

    adequately

    court

    mandamus

    recently

    petition

    because

    presented

    has

    in

    the
    the

    as

    facts

    decided

    moot.

    We

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    PETITION DENIED

    You might also like