Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Kenneth Awe v. Warden Mathena, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kenneth Awe appealed the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Warden Mathena as frivolous and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding that the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Kenneth Awe v. Warden Mathena, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Kenneth Awe appealed the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Warden Mathena as frivolous and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding that the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-01-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7115

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Kenneth Awe appealed the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Warden Mathena as frivolous and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding that the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Kenneth Awe v. Warden Mathena, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Kenneth Awe appealed the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Warden Mathena as frivolous and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding that the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7115

    KENNETH V. AWE,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN MATHENA,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (7:14-cv-00241-JLK-RSB)

    Submitted:

    January 15, 2015

    Decided:

    January 20, 2015

    Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kenneth V. Awe, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kenneth
    dismissing
    complaint

    V.

    without
    as

    Awe

    appeals

    prejudice

    frivolous,

    the

    his

    pursuant

    district

    42
    to

    U.S.C.
    28

    courts
    1983

    U.S.C.

    (2012)

    1915A(b)(1)

    (2012), and denying his motion to alter or amend.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    order

    We have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Awe v.

    Mathena, No. 7:14-cv-00241-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. July 3 & 15, 2014).


    We

    dispense

    contentions

    with
    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the

    facts

    and

    the

    materials

    legal
    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like