Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ceesay Janko, Jr. v. US Immigration Court, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    16 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Ceesay Janko Jr. appealed a district court decision dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the United States Immigration Court and Department of Homeland Security. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Janko's appeal to be frivolous, so they dismissed the appeal for the same reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-01-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-2164

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Ceesay Janko Jr. appealed a district court decision dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the United States Immigration Court and Department of Homeland Security. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Janko's appeal to be frivolous, so they dismissed the appeal for the same reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    16 views2 pages

    Ceesay Janko, Jr. v. US Immigration Court, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Ceesay Janko Jr. appealed a district court decision dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the United States Immigration Court and Department of Homeland Security. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found Janko's appeal to be frivolous, so they dismissed the appeal for the same reasons stated by the district court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-2164

    CEESAY JANKO, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION COURT; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
    HOMELAND SECURITY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Robert J. Conrad,
    Jr., District Judge. (3:14-cv-00533-RJC-DCK)

    Submitted:

    January 22, 2015

    Decided:

    January 26, 2015

    Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ceesay Janko, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ceesay Janko, Jr., appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
    that

    this

    appeal

    is

    We have reviewed the record and find

    frivolous.

    Accordingly,

    we

    dismiss

    appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

    the

    Janko v.

    U.S. Immigration Ct., No. 3:14-cv-00533-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Oct.


    8, 2014).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like