Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Joseph Daniels v. William Jarrett, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Joseph A. Daniels against William Jarrett under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied Daniels relief and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its opinion and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-01-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7385

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Joseph A. Daniels against William Jarrett under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied Daniels relief and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its opinion and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    Joseph Daniels v. William Jarrett, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Joseph A. Daniels against William Jarrett under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied Daniels relief and the Fourth Circuit affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its opinion and dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7385

    JOSEPH A. DANIELS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    WILLIAM JARRETT, Lieutenant Colonel,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Robert E. Payne, Senior
    District Judge. (3:13-cv-00440-REP)

    Submitted:

    January 22, 2015

    Decided:

    January 27, 2015

    Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Joseph A. Daniels, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Joseph A. Daniels appeals the district courts order
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
    relief

    on

    his

    42

    U.S.C.

    1983

    (2012)

    complaint.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Daniels

    v. Jarrett, No. 3:13-cv-00440-REP (E.D. Va. July 22, 2014).


    dispense

    with

    contentions

    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    We

    and

    legal

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like