Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Dwight Spears v. Warden Mansukhani, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Dwight Spears' 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the petition. The appellate court also granted Spears in forma pauperis status and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Dwight Spears v. Warden Mansukhani, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Dwight Spears' 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the petition. The appellate court also granted Spears in forma pauperis status and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-01-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7529

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Dwight Spears' 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the petition. The appellate court also granted Spears in forma pauperis status and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Dwight Spears v. Warden Mansukhani, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Dwight Spears' 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss the petition. The appellate court also granted Spears in forma pauperis status and dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7529

    DWIGHT SPEARS,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    v.
    WARDEN MANSUKHANI,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
    (0:14-cv-00281-RBH)

    Submitted:

    January 22, 2015

    Decided:

    January 27, 2015

    Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Dwight Lamar Spears, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Dwight
    district

    Spears,

    courts

    order

    federal

    accepting

    the

    prisoner,

    appeals

    recommendation

    of

    the
    the

    magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C.


    2241 (2012) petition.
    reversible

    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly,

    although

    we

    grant

    leave

    to

    proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    Spears v. Mansukhani, No. 0:14-cv-00281-RBH

    (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 2014).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    this

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like