Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    James Roudabush, Jr. v. Sgt. F. Mensah, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of James Lester Roudabush Jr.'s post-judgment motion to reopen proceedings in his civil action. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented such that argument would not aid in the decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    James Roudabush, Jr. v. Sgt. F. Mensah, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of James Lester Roudabush Jr.'s post-judgment motion to reopen proceedings in his civil action. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented such that argument would not aid in the decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-02-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7827

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of James Lester Roudabush Jr.'s post-judgment motion to reopen proceedings in his civil action. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented such that argument would not aid in the decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    James Roudabush, Jr. v. Sgt. F. Mensah, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of James Lester Roudabush Jr.'s post-judgment motion to reopen proceedings in his civil action. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented such that argument would not aid in the decision. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7827

    JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    SGT. F. MENSAH; D. LAWHORNE, Sheriff; STEARNS, Chief;
    F. MILANO,
    Captain;
    G.
    HUNTER;
    C. M.
    KYLTON,
    USDJ;
    MS. ERVIN, Classification Supv.; GRAHAM, Classification
    Counselor;
    HYLTON,
    Director,
    U.S.
    Marshal
    Service;
    J. COREY, FPDO; A. ANDERSON, SAUSA; K. PEDERSEN, AUSA;
    LT. REA,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
    District Judge. (2:13-cv-00646-RBS-LRL)

    Submitted:

    February 12, 2015

    Decided:

    February 19, 2015

    Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James Lester Roudabush, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    James
    courts

    order

    Lester
    denying

    Roudabush,
    his

    Jr.,

    post-judgment

    proceedings in his civil action.


    and find no reversible error.

    No.

    with

    contentions

    are

    oral

    argument

    adequately

    motion

    district

    to

    reopen

    Accordingly, we affirm for the

    2:13-cv-00646-RBS-LRL

    We dispense

    the

    We have reviewed the record

    reasons stated by the district court.


    Mensah,

    appeals

    Roudabush v. Sgt. F.

    (E.D. Va.

    because

    presented

    in

    Nov.

    10,

    2014).

    the

    facts

    and

    the

    materials

    legal
    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like