Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Fred Blount, III, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    Fred Blount, III appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). An unpublished per curiam opinion by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-03-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7604

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Fred Blount, III appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). An unpublished per curiam opinion by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    15 views2 pages

    United States v. Fred Blount, III, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Fred Blount, III appealed the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). An unpublished per curiam opinion by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7604

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    FRED BLOUNT, III,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Mark S. Davis, District
    Judge. (2:95-cr-00138-MSD-1)

    Submitted:

    March 9, 2015
    Amended:

    Before WILKINSON and


    Senior Circuit Judge.

    Decided:

    March 17, 2015

    March 17, 2015

    DUNCAN,

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    HAMILTON,

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Fred Blount, III, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr,


    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Norfolk,
    Virginia,
    for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Fred

    Blount,

    III,

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction


    of sentence.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Blount, No. 2:95-cr-00138-MSD-

    1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2014).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like