Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Jonathan Torres v. V.B.C.C., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jonathan Torres filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against a jail and sheriff which was dismissed by the district court under Rule 41(b). Torres appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal. The appeals court denied Torres' motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Jonathan Torres v. V.B.C.C., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    Jonathan Torres filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against a jail and sheriff which was dismissed by the district court under Rule 41(b). Torres appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal. The appeals court denied Torres' motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-04-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7615

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jonathan Torres filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against a jail and sheriff which was dismissed by the district court under Rule 41(b). Torres appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal. The appeals court denied Torres' motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    15 views2 pages

    Jonathan Torres v. V.B.C.C., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jonathan Torres filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against a jail and sheriff which was dismissed by the district court under Rule 41(b). Torres appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's dismissal. The appeals court denied Torres' motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7615

    JONATHAN TORRES,
    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    V.B.C.C., Jail; KEN STOLEY, Sheriff,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
    Judge. (1:14-cv-00897-GBL-JFA)

    Submitted:

    March 20, 2015

    Decided:

    April 8, 2015

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jonathan Torres, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Jonathan

    Torres

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint pursuant to


    Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    district

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    court.

    Torres

    v.

    V.B.C.C.,

    1:14-cv-00897-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 2014).


    motion

    for

    appointment

    of

    counsel

    and

    Jail,

    No.

    We deny Torres

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like