Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stanley Moultrie v. William Byars, JR., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    33 views3 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal by Stanley Lee Moultrie of orders by the magistrate judge denying his motion to amend his complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals found that it did not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the orders Moultrie sought to appeal were not final orders and did not fall under the limited categories of interlocutory or collateral orders that can be appealed. Therefore, the Court dismissed the appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-04-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7873

    Original Title

    Stanley Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal by Stanley Lee Moultrie of orders by the magistrate judge denying his motion to amend his complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals found that it did not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the orders Moultrie sought to appeal were not final orders and did not fall under the limited categories of interlocutory or collateral orders that can be appealed. Therefore, the Court dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    33 views3 pages

    Stanley Moultrie v. William Byars, JR., 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal by Stanley Lee Moultrie of orders by the magistrate judge denying his motion to amend his complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals found that it did not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the orders Moultrie sought to appeal were not final orders and did not fall under the limited categories of interlocutory or collateral orders that can be appealed. Therefore, the Court dismissed the appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7873

    STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections
    Director; BRYAN P STIRLING; DEPUTY DIRECTOR ROBERT WARD;
    SCDC
    GENERAL
    COUNSEL
    DAYNE
    HAILE;
    ASSOCIATE
    WARDEN
    MCFADDEN; MAJOR C WEST; CHRISTOPHER D. FLORIAN; BETHEA LT
    MICHAEL TOMS; ANN HALLMAN, Agency Grievance Coordinator; MS
    GRAVES, ECI Grievance Coordinator; MARIA LEGGINS, Agency
    Mailroom Coordinator; LT JAMES MARTIN; WILLIE L. EAGLETON,
    Evan Warden; SGT H
    SIMS; MS. BAKER, Mailroom Coordinator;
    PAMELA MCDOWELL, Mailroom Supervisor; ASSOCIATE WARDEN
    BUSH, Lee CI; ASSOCIATE WARDEN
    NOLAN; ASSOCIATE WARDEN
    DEAN; K RIVERS, Lee CI Grievance Coordinator; JIMMY SLEIGH;
    DEPUTY WARDEN; LT JACK BROWN; MS CONYERS, Lee CI Officer;
    GENERAL COUNSEL
    TATARSKY; DEPUTY DIRECTOR MCCALL; AMY
    SMITH; D
    EASTRIDGE; FELICIA MCQUEEN; SANDRA BOWIE; DEPUTY
    WARDEN
    DAVIS; CAPTAIN MR. THOMAS; MS. WILSON; GOVERNOR
    NIKKI HALEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL ALAN WILSON,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Beaufort.
    Bristow Marchant, Magistrate
    Judge. (9:14-cv-01690-DCN-BM)

    Submitted:

    April 23, 2015

    Decided:

    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    April 28, 2015

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Stanley Lee Moultrie, Appellant Pro Se.


    Jerome Scott Kozacki,
    WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Stanley Lee Moultrie seeks to appeal the magistrate judges
    text

    orders

    denying

    his

    motion

    to

    amend

    denying his motion for reconsideration.

    his

    complaint

    and

    This court may exercise

    jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2012),


    and

    certain

    interlocutory

    and

    collateral

    orders,

    28

    U.S.C.

    1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.


    Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
    seeks

    to

    appeal

    are

    neither

    final

    interlocutory or collateral orders.


    appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

    The orders Moultrie

    orders

    nor

    appealable

    Accordingly, we dismiss the

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like