Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Darryl Adkins v. Officer McDonald, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Darryl Boyd Adkins appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two correctional officers. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in the lower court decision. The appellate court denied Adkins' request for appointed counsel and dispensed with oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-04-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 14-7879

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Darryl Boyd Adkins appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two correctional officers. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in the lower court decision. The appellate court denied Adkins' request for appointed counsel and dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Darryl Adkins v. Officer McDonald, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. Darryl Boyd Adkins appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against two correctional officers. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in the lower court decision. The appellate court denied Adkins' request for appointed counsel and dispensed with oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 14-7879

    DARRYL BOYD ADKINS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MCDONALD; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WHITE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    James C. Fox, Senior
    District Judge. (5:14-ct-03144-F)

    Submitted:

    April 23, 2015

    Decided:

    April 28, 2015

    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Darryl Boyd Adkins, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Darryl
    dismissing

    Boyd
    his

    Adkins
    42

    appeals

    U.S.C.

    the

    1983

    district

    (2012)

    courts

    complaint

    Defendants after a 28 U.S.C. 1915 (2012) review.


    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    order

    against
    We have

    Accordingly,

    we deny Adkins motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for


    the reasons stated by the district court.

    Adkins v. McDonald,

    No. 5:14-ct-03144-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2014).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like