Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Catherine Randolph v. Loretta E. Lynch, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Catherine Randolph appealed the district court's dismissal of her complaint against the U.S. Attorney General as frivolous and for failing to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, dismissing the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-05-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-1174

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Catherine Randolph appealed the district court's dismissal of her complaint against the U.S. Attorney General as frivolous and for failing to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, dismissing the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Catherine Randolph v. Loretta E. Lynch, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Catherine Randolph appealed the district court's dismissal of her complaint against the U.S. Attorney General as frivolous and for failing to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, dismissing the appeal for the same reasons provided by the district court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-1174

    CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore.
    James K. Bredar, District Judge.
    (1:15-cv-00314-JKB)

    Submitted:

    May 19, 2015

    Decided: May 21, 2015

    Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Catherine

    Denise

    Randolph

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to


    state a claim.

    See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly,

    we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Randolph

    Feb. 12,

    2015).

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    v.
    We

    Holder,

    No.

    dispense

    with

    1:15-cv-00314-JKB
    oral

    argument

    contentions

    are

    adequately

    this

    and

    argument

    court

    (D.

    Md.

    because

    the

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like