Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Anif Williams, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Anif Christopher Williams appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Williams' motion for a sentence reduction.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-05-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6407

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Anif Christopher Williams appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Williams' motion for a sentence reduction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Anif Williams, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Anif Christopher Williams appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Williams' motion for a sentence reduction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6407

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    ANIF CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Charlottesville.
    James P. Jones,
    District Judge. (3:93-cr-00010-JPJ-2)

    Submitted:

    May 19, 2015

    Decided: May 22, 2015

    Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anif Christopher Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Jennie L. M.


    Waering, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia,
    for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Anif Christopher Williams appeals the district courts
    order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a
    sentence reduction.
    reversible error.
    by

    the

    district

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    court.

    United

    States

    v.

    Williams,

    No.

    3:93-cr-00010-JPJ-2 (W.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2015).

    We dispense with

    oral

    contentions

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    this

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like