Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Unpublished

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views4 pages
    This document summarizes five appeals cases from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. In each case, the district court referred the case to a magistrate judge, who then recommended that relief be denied under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The plaintiff, Belinda Slade, failed to file timely objections to the magistrate judge's recommendations, and therefore waived her right to appellate review. As a result, the appeals court denied Slade's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed all five appeals.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-05-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-1264

    Original Title

    Belinda Slade v. Donald Slade, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes five appeals cases from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. In each case, the district court referred the case to a magistrate judge, who then recommended that relief be denied under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The plaintiff, Belinda Slade, failed to file timely objections to the magistrate judge's recommendations, and therefore waived her right to appellate review. As a result, the appeals court denied Slade's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed all five appeals.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    14 views4 pages

    Unpublished

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes five appeals cases from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. In each case, the district court referred the case to a magistrate judge, who then recommended that relief be denied under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The plaintiff, Belinda Slade, failed to file timely objections to the magistrate judge's recommendations, and therefore waived her right to appellate review. As a result, the appeals court denied Slade's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed all five appeals.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 4

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-1264

    BELINDA SLADE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DONALD E. SLADE; YVETTE SLADE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    No. 15-1265

    BELINDA SLADE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    SEALO MICHAEL; LAVONNE MICHAEL,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    No. 15-1266

    BELINDA SLADE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    CATHY HARRIS; SPENCE HARRIS,

    Defendants - Appellees.

    No. 15-1267

    BELINDA SLADE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    THEODORE MICHAEL,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    No. 15-1268

    BELINDA SLADE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    TRUDY MICHAEL,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
    Loretta Copeland
    Biggs, District Judge.
    (1:14-cv-00968-LCB-LPA; 1:14-cv-00969LCB-LPA; 1:14-cv-00970-LCB-LPA; 1:14-cv-00971-LCB-LPA; 1:14-cv00973-LCB-LPA)

    Submitted:

    May 21, 2015

    Decided:

    Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    May 26, 2015

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Belinda Slade, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Belinda Slade seeks to appeal the district courts orders
    denying

    relief

    on

    her

    civil

    complaints.

    The

    district

    court

    referred these cases to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.


    636(b)(1)(B) (2012).
    case

    that

    relief

    be

    The magistrate judge recommended in each


    denied

    under

    28

    U.S.C.

    1915(e)(2)(B)

    (2012), and advised Slade that failure to file timely, specific


    objections to each recommendation could waive appellate review
    of a district court order based upon that recommendation.
    The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate
    judges recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review
    of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have
    been warned of the consequences of noncompliance.

    Wright v.

    Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas
    v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).

    Slade has waived appellate review

    in

    file

    each

    case

    by

    proper notice.

    failing

    to

    objections

    after

    receiving

    Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma

    pauperis and dismiss the appeals.


    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions

    are

    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like