Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Leonard Hudson, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Leonard Andre Hudson's motion for a sentence reduction. Hudson appealed the district court's ruling that he was not eligible for a reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its February 25, 2015 ruling denying Hudson's motion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2015-05-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 15-6345

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Leonard Andre Hudson's motion for a sentence reduction. Hudson appealed the district court's ruling that he was not eligible for a reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its February 25, 2015 ruling denying Hudson's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Leonard Hudson, 4th Cir. (2015)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Leonard Andre Hudson's motion for a sentence reduction. Hudson appealed the district court's ruling that he was not eligible for a reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its February 25, 2015 ruling denying Hudson's motion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 15-6345

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    LEONARD ANDRE
    Dantee Keys,

    HUDSON,

    a/k/a

    Steven

    Orlando

    Hudson,

    a/k/a

    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Abingdon.
    James P. Jones, District
    Judge. (1:07-cr-00016-JPJ-1)

    Submitted:

    May 21, 2015

    Decided:

    May 27, 2015

    Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Leonard Andre Hudson, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Leonard

    Andre

    Hudson

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence


    reduction.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    United States v. Hudson, No. 1:07-cr-00016-JPJ-

    1 (W.D. Va. Feb. 25, 2015).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
    the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like